Supreme Court: voter suppression a-ok!

About a week ago I attended the launch event for the Hip-Hop Team Vote campaign here in Philly. Spearheaded by Russell Simmons (see my cellphone pic at left), Ben Chavis and others, the campaign’s goal is not only to get young voters out to the polls, but to turn them into voting activists — registering their immediate and extended family members and spreading the word about voting rights in general. The animating logic here is that communities must take the initiative, but it goes without saying that the U.S. must take concrete steps to facilitate access and remove all undue obstacles to the polls. I’m hardly the first to ask why, for instance, Election Day is on a Tuesday. Open the polls on a weekend and wouldn’t the turnout spike automatically? Democratic participation isn’t necessarily that simple, but a few simple steps would almost certainly help.

It’s in this context that the Supreme Court’s ruling on a de facto voter suppression law in Indiana is so disgraceful. Rather than remove voting obstacles, Indiana is erecting new ones. And the Supreme Court approves, citing instances of voter fraud not in present-day Indiana, but in 19th-century New York.
Yes, this ruling will impact the Indiana Democratic primary. Marty Lederman has more.

Comments are closed.